a policy needs to be formed and adhered to for people banned from visiting public housing to be allowed back



Traveling the Internet I happened upon Housing- lets get serious! by Brandon Collins, an poorly written but interesting piece, not without some insight.

I certainly could agree with the basic principle, that every person has the right to live in safe home that they can afford.http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif

But what really hit me was a peripheral demand, seemingly out of the blue, and not supported by any previous argument:

-a policy needs to be formed and adhered to for people banned from visiting public housing to be allowed back.

What people? When were they banned? And, for what given reason?

If they were banned to keep them from associating with residents, I could certainly agree.

If they were banned to keep them from disturbing the residents, then I would be siding with the residents.

The previous blanket statement that I object to has all the ear-marks of pandering to some special interest.

This assumption could have been avoided by simply providing more information.

Thanks,
Dave



Please Donate to our Union Printer Drive!